Realize Medical
Research Library · Independent literature review

Multi-specialty: How often does VR change the surgical plan?

5 Multi-specialty studies in the library address this question.

Multi-specialty: How often the plan changesBar chart. Multi-specialty: How often the plan changes. Surveys and user studies 2, Reviews 3.RESEARCH LIBRARY · INDEPENDENT LITERATURE REVIEWMulti-specialty: How often the planchanges5 studies in the library, by study designSurveys and user studies2Reviews3Positive findingMixedDescriptiveNo significant differenceRealize Medical Research Library · 631 studies · updated 2026-10-03

What the studies report

  • Positive finding
    “While XR technologies improved surgeon confidence and altered surgical strategies in several cases, most studies were small and single-center feasibility evaluations.”

    Afroz 2026 · Systematic review · n: 30 studies

  • Positive finding
    “VR was the most utilized technology (17 studies), improving spatial understanding and prompting plan modifications in 32%-52% of cases (e.g., lung segmentectomies, TAVR).”

    Khubzan 2026 · Systematic review

  • Positive finding
    “Notably, surgical planning using VR led to more frequent changes in surgical plans compared to planning with other visualization methods when surgeons reassessed their initial plans.”

    Queisner 2024 · Systematic review

  • Mixed
    “The operative plan changed 8.3% of the time after VRM.”

    Bramlet 2024 · Survey/user study · n: 12 patients

How strong is the evidence?

Of 5 studies with a finding on this question: 3 report a positive finding, 2 mixed. These reflect what each study's authors report.

Study designs: 2 surveys and user studies and 3 reviews.

All 5 studies

Virtual Reality for Preoperative Surgical Planning in Complex Pediatric Oncology #

Bramlet M et al. · Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A · 2024

Multi-specialty · Survey/user study · n: 12 patients

Mixed
“The operative plan changed 8.3% of the time after VRM.”

8.3%

DOIPubMed

Clinical acceptance of advanced visualization methods: a comparison study of 3D-print, virtual reality glasses, and 3D-display #

Muff JL et al. · 3D printing in medicine · 2022

Multi-specialty · Survey/user study

Mixed
“Possible change in treatment was reported using 3D-Print in 33%, VR-Glasses in 44%, and 3D-Display in 33% of participants.”

44%

DOIPubMedFree full text

Immersive extended reality (XR) in oncology: a scoping review of virtual reality (VR) and mixed reality (MR) applications for 3D solid tumor visualization #

Afroz S, Zhang L · Frontiers in Virtual Reality · 2026

Multi-specialty · Systematic review · n: 30 studies

Positive finding
“While XR technologies improved surgeon confidence and altered surgical strategies in several cases, most studies were small and single-center feasibility evaluations.”

DOI

The digital evolution of surgical planning: a systematic review of immersive and interactive technologies #

Khubzan WD et al. · Frontiers in surgery · 2026

Multi-specialty · Systematic review

Positive finding
“VR was the most utilized technology (17 studies), improving spatial understanding and prompting plan modifications in 32%-52% of cases (e.g., lung segmentectomies, TAVR).”

32%-52%

DOIPubMedFree full text

Surgical planning in virtual reality: a systematic review #

Queisner M, Eisenträger K · Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024

Multi-specialty · Systematic review

Positive finding
“Notably, surgical planning using VR led to more frequent changes in surgical plans compared to planning with other visualization methods when surgeons reassessed their initial plans.”

DOIPubMedFree full text

All multi-specialty studiesThis question across specialtiesBrowse the whole library

Summarises published research on VR/AR surgical planning across all platforms. Not product labelling. For Elucis indications see /elucis.

Intended for healthcare professionals.

Summaries and quotes describe each study's methods and the findings its authors report. They are not claims by Realize Medical and may contain errors: please read the original paper. Inclusion is not an endorsement of any product or use.