Realize Medical
Research Library · Independent literature review

Urology: Does VR surgical planning improve patient outcomes?

12 Urology studies in the library address this question.

Urology: Patient outcomesBar chart. Urology: Patient outcomes. Randomized trials 5, Comparative or prospective studies 2, Retrospective studies 2, Reviews 2, Case reports & technical 1.RESEARCH LIBRARY · INDEPENDENT LITERATURE REVIEWUrology: Patient outcomes12 studies in the library, by study designRandomized trials5Comparative or prospecti…2Retrospective studies2Reviews2Case reports & technical1Positive findingMixedDescriptiveNo significant differenceRealize Medical Research Library · 631 studies · updated 2026-10-03

What the studies report

  • Positive finding
    “The CT+iVR group had a significant improvement in absolute stone-free rate (33.70% vs 20.22%, P = .043) and overall < 4 mm remnant rate (62.79% vs 48.20%, P = .044).”

    Cumpanas 2025 · Randomized controlled trial · n: 175 patients

  • Positive finding
    “MR-assisted surgery can reduce the incidence of intraoperative complications and improve perioperative outcomes, and MR may be a good preoperative tool for planning complex renal tumor surgery.”

    Yang 2022 · Randomized controlled trial · n: 92 patients

  • Positive finding
    “There were no complications or positive margins noted in the VR group.”

    Shirk 2019 · Comparative study · n: 60 patients

  • Positive finding
    “The estimated intraoperative blood loss was also lower in the MR group compared to the control group (58.50(53.00 63.00) ml vs. 77.00(72.00 86.00) ml, p < 0.001).”

    Zou 2026 · Retrospective cohort · n: 82 patients

How strong is the evidence?

Of 12 studies with a finding on this question: 5 report a positive finding, 2 mixed, 1 descriptive, 4 no significant difference. These reflect what each study's authors report.

Study designs: 5 randomized trials, 2 comparative or prospective studies, 2 retrospective studies, 2 reviews and 1 case report, case series or technical report.

Randomized trials: 5 trials on this question; 2 reported a positive finding, 1 mixed results, 2 no significant difference.

All 12 studies

Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy with and without Mixed Reality - REALITATEM study #

Duarte DM Junior et al. · International braz j urol · 2026

Urology · Randomized controlled trial · n: 45 patients

No significant difference
“No difference was detected regarding complication rate.”

DOIPubMedFree full text

Preoperative Immersive Virtual Reality Applied to Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Study of Surgical Planning and Clinical Outcomes #

Cumpanas AD et al. · The Journal of urology · 2025

Urology · Randomized controlled trial · n: 175 patients

Positive finding
“The CT+iVR group had a significant improvement in absolute stone-free rate (33.70% vs 20.22%, P = .043) and overall < 4 mm remnant rate (62.79% vs 48.20%, P = .044).”

P = .043

DOIPubMedFree full text

Mixed Reality: A Step Further for Planning Complex Renal Tumors (RENAL Nephrometry Score of 7 or Higher) #

Yang Y et al. · Journal of endourology · 2022

Urology · Randomized controlled trial · n: 92 patients

Positive finding
“MR-assisted surgery can reduce the incidence of intraoperative complications and improve perioperative outcomes, and MR may be a good preoperative tool for planning complex renal tumor surgery.”

DOIPubMed

Effect of 3-Dimensional, Virtual Reality Models for Surgical Planning of Robotic Prostatectomy on Trifecta Outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Trial #

Shirk JD et al. · The Journal of urology · 2022

Urology · Randomized controlled trial · n: 92 patients

No significant difference
“trends toward lower positive margin rates (33% vs 25%) in the intervention group, no significant difference in functional outcomes and no difference in traditional operative metrics (p >0.05).”

p >0.05

DOIPubMedFree full text

Effect of 3-Dimensional Virtual Reality Models for Surgical Planning of Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy on Surgical Outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Trial #

Shirk JD et al. · JAMA network open · 2019

Urology · Randomized controlled trial · n: 92 patients

Mixed
“When controlling for case complexity and other covariates, patients whose surgical planning involved 3-D VR models showed differences in operative time (odds ratio [OR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.37-2.70; estimated OR, 2.47), estimated blood loss (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.04-3.78; estimated OR, 4.56), clamp time (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 0.79-3.23; estimated OR, 11.22), and length of hospital stay (OR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.59-5.14; estimated OR, 5.43).”

DOIPubMedFree full text

Mixed reality three dimensional visualization facilitates repair of posterior urethral rupture after pelvic fracture #

Hua Y et al. · Research Square · 2025

Urology · Preprint (prospective cohort) · n: 32 patients

No significant difference
“No statistically significant differences in the intraoperative blood loss volume or postoperative complication rates were observed (P > 0.05).”

P > 0.05

DOI

The Use of 3-Dimensional, Virtual Reality Models for Surgical Planning of Robotic Partial Nephrectomy #

Shirk JD et al. · Urology · 2019

Urology · Comparative study · n: 60 patients

Positive finding
“There were no complications or positive margins noted in the VR group.”

DOIPubMed

Exploring the advantages of mixed reality technology in Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial adrenalectomy #

Zou XC et al. · World journal of surgical oncology · 2026

Urology · Retrospective cohort · n: 82 patients

Positive finding
“The estimated intraoperative blood loss was also lower in the MR group compared to the control group (58.50(53.00 63.00) ml vs. 77.00(72.00 86.00) ml, p < 0.001).”

p < 0.001

DOIPubMedFree full text

The clinical application value of mixed reality in robotic laparoscopic partial nephrectomy #

Zou XC et al. · Frontiers in oncology · 2024

Urology · Retrospective cohort · n: 68 patients

No significant difference
“All patients had negative resection margins, indicating equivalent therapeutic outcomes between the two groups.”

DOIPubMedFree full text

Mixed reality applications in percutaneous stone surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of stone-free rate and perioperative complications #

Lo CY et al. · BJUI compass · 2026

Urology · Systematic review

Mixed
“The MR-assisted group had modest improvements in SFR compared to the control group (RR = 1.09; 95% CI 1.00-1.18; p = 0.044; I 2 = 17.3%, p = 0.29).”

RR = 1.09

DOIPubMedFree full text

3D Printing, Augmented Reality, and Virtual Reality for the Assessment and Management of Kidney and Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review #

Wake N et al. · Urology · 2020

Urology · Systematic review

Positive finding
“Existing evidence demonstrates improvement in clinical outcomes, surgical planning and intra-operative guidance, as well as training.”

DOIPubMed

Application of Mixed Reality Technology in the Planning of PCNL for Special Types of Complex Upper Urinary Stones: A Pilot Study #

Liu Y et al. · Urology · 2025

Urology · Feasibility study · n: 15 patients

Descriptive
“There were no occurrences of Clavien-Dindo grade≥II complications.”

DOIPubMed

All urology studiesThis question across specialtiesBrowse the whole library

Summarises published research on VR/AR surgical planning across all platforms. Not product labelling. For Elucis indications see /elucis.

Intended for healthcare professionals.

Summaries and quotes describe each study's methods and the findings its authors report. They are not claims by Realize Medical and may contain errors: please read the original paper. Inclusion is not an endorsement of any product or use.